Qudratullah Shahab & Mumtaz Mufti's Works

[Bowman]

Hi...

Hope that some of you have read the works of Qudratullah Shahab (Shahab Nama) and Mumtaz Mufti (Alakh Nagri, Talaash & Labeek to be specific). Would like your reviews on them.

[poor_ophie]

I've been a great admirer of both these writers. Shahab naama give us a glimpse of our history. The last chapter of it, however, is a shocking one. It changes the whole concept of the book. Alakh nagri from Mufti Sahib concur with the last chapter of shahaab naama. Both of the writers belong to a school of thought to whom Late Ashfaq Ahmad belonged as well. I think if all the incidents described in these books are true, then these people were sufis of modern age.

[Bowman]

Hey....

Are Ophie and poor_ophie the same or are you an imposter (well wrong question to answer if you are an imposter)

Anyways welcome back....what happened to your previous ID?

[Pracs]

Well, you missed out the couple ashfaque ahmed and wife bano qudsia,. the four all together make up splendid reading. I heard the late Ashfaque Ahmed in one of his last interviews that Qudisa was working on a very huge project, a huge novel that he said would be a milestone in Urdu literature. I am waiting for that to come out. I hope she finishes it.

I'd also recommend you to read ''Raja Gidh'' by Qudsia,, it's amazing and was ahead of its time.

other links on

http//www.accountancy.com.pk/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1179&SearchTerms=obituary



"Allah does not change the state of people unless they change what is within themselves" Quran 1311

[Bowman]

Yeap the four of them (infact five including Ibn-e-Insha) made a team.

Pracs I am reading Raja Gidh as well these days, along with Talaash. Its very 'interesting'.... the concept of halal and haram in the genes...and the effect of such in the generations that come.

Anyways, Banu Qudsia is a whole different story.

What I am more interested in this thread is your views on the meta physical instances as quoted by QU Shahab in his last chapter and a more detailed account of such in the Alakh Nagri.

[abdulmajid]

i had read once both elie pur ka elie of mumtaz mufti and shahab nama. elie pur ka elie is defintely the most rubbish thing in my life that i have read. especially that bunyan thing, yakhkhkh!! i will only read his work next time on a gun point.
shahab nama is great except the last and first chapter, don't know what the writer was trying to say in the last chapter "chhota munh bari baat" normally people who have little knowledge of religion start believing in tasawuff in old age.
however shahbnama is a must-read for a person who wants to know anything about early history of pakistan. it's actually not a history book but an autobiography where the writer has described the things the way he felt. offcourse one feels shahab saheb had this habbit of exaggerating things especially his narration of governor general ghulam mohammed.

akhbarak eih habibbie??

[Bowman]

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by abdulmajid</i>
<br />i had read once both elie pur ka elie of mumtaz mufti and shahab nama. elie pur ka elie is defintely the most rubbish thing in my life that i have read. especially that bunyan thing, yakhkhkh!! i will only read his work next time on a gun point.
shahab nama is great except the last and first chapter, don't know what the writer was trying to say in the last chapter "chhota munh bari baat" normally people who have little knowledge of religion start believing in tasawuff in old age.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">

Well try out Alakh Nagri (without the gun point)..... believe me its extremely different from Alipur Ka Ailee. Would like your comments after you read it. Thing is that last chapter of Shahab Nama inspired MM to write Alakh Nagri and more than half the book is about QU Shahab.

[Pracs]

Bowman is correct, Ali pur ka ailii and alakh nagri are a world apart. Personally i think that ali pur ka aili is one of the most honest works on personal biographies in Urdu, ever. Like wise Alakh nagri spells out how the author goes through life and finds the profound Sufi.By the way Alakh nagri has more yukky things than just the banyan ,.. but then,.. isn't all that ''reality''

Yes and about the metaphysics and sufism, in QUS writing and then later mumtaz mufti, is some what of what one wishes to believe in. I am one to believe in SUFISM, it has had a great impact on the history of South Asia. There is a lot of hog wash going around in our society these days, but then there are some practicioners of this age old school of thought. I think a number of people did believe in Sufism in our society, however, coming in from the top most madarian of the day came as at a bit of shock for the intelligenisia. So much so that, people believe and quote the whole of Shahabnama on various issues and just shrug of the chapters on ''90'' and all the details on QUS visit to '''Bait ul Muqadas''.




"Allah does not change the state of people unless they change what is within themselves" Quran 1311

[abdulmajid]

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">originally posted by bowman
Well try out Alakh Nagri (without the gun point)..... believe me its extremely different from Alipur Ka Ailee. Would like your comments after you read it. Thing is that last chapter of Shahab Nama inspired MM to write Alakh Nagri and more than half the book is about QU Shahab.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
sorry mate!! i have still no interest in reading that book. infact i have no interest in <b>khanqahiyyat</b>. if ever a 70, 80 or 90 comes in my life, i'll tell him/her get lost!!!. and i'll read <b>auzubillah</b> too [D]

akhbarak eih habibbie??

[Pracs]

ahhn so you think khaqaniyat and sufism are one and the same, think again,, try reading Ali Hajveri's 'Kashf al maajoob'

"Allah does not change the state of people unless they change what is within themselves" Quran 1311

[rimkhan1]

This article is from http//www.khalidhasan.net/fridaytimes/2003-10-17.htm .<b>I love Mufti and Shahab and love and appreciate what they wrote and I dont care if they are true or not. You will know about these things when the time will come. I knew about these things because I had such experiences so I believe and love what they say.</b> For the doubters here is another view and there are lot more

Believing the unbelievable



Khalid Hasan



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

utside of publishing circles few people would know – or for that matter care – that the one book which sells consistently, edition after edition, and has done so since its publication nearly twenty years ago is Qudratullah Shahab’s Shahabnama.

The question to ask is why? Does it sell because of the many stories it contains? There are some revolving around haunted houses (“The restless spirit of Bimla Kumari”); there is an account of the plague in Jammu; the tale of the young Shahab’s encounter with India’s greatest Vedantic philosopher, Dr Radhakrishnan, which the future president of India loses hands down; and stories of the paralysed Ghulam Muhammad ruling Pakistan through sign language and gibberish that only Shahab and the governor general’s memsahib secretary could decipher. Or is the books success because of Shahab’s strange mystical encounters with a spirit codenamed Ninety? I would vote for the latter explanation. In Shahab’s book, the line between fact and fanciful fiction is thin and, more often than not, nonexistent. He could be said to have invented a new genre in Urdu literature that one can best describe as fictionalised fact.

Since his death and that of his acolyte Mumtaz Mufti, many have wondered if the stories they both told about each other were a big put on or if they had any basis in fact. In Pakistan, superstition has been rising over the years, a phenomenon always associated with insecurity and lack of confidence in the living environment. Uncertainty, no one will disagree, has been the only certainty since the break-up of 1971. What other than superstition can one expect in a country where fifty-six years after its establishment, a debate is still going on as to why it came into being. The history of the Indian Muslim urge to be free of economic exploitation and the tyranny of the majority has been entirely rewritten. Were the Quaid-e-Azam to return to life, I doubt he would recognise today’s Pakistan as the country he created. Shahab and Mufti’s “shortcut to nirvana” is popular because, if the stories that the two men have spun are true, then anyone can get to the promised land without much work. Just a few trick mantras or a being called Ninety or Ninety-nine would do the necessary. A lifetime of prayer and contemplation is too long and too arduous. Everyone can now become a saint in his spare time.

Over ten years ago Ajmal Kamal, who runs an admirable magazine and literary publishing house in Karachi, wrote a review article based on the second volume of Mumtaz Mufti’s autobiography Alakh Nagri. He pointed out that the picture on the cover was not the author’s but Shahab’s, which according to Mufti was “in the fitness of things”. His preface said that in the first half of his life, he discovered Woman and in the second half Qudratullah Shahab.

Despite the charm and likeability of Shahab, it is not easy to forget or condone that he authored the infamous editorial “A new leaf” when the Progressive Papers, the flagship of progressivism in Pakistan, were taken over by Field Marshal Ayub Khan, or that he founded the Pakistan Writers’ Guild and even the National Press Trust. Mufti was not concerned with that sort of thing because he believed that it was Shahab who was responsible for some of Pakistan’s seminal events. He caused the capital chosen by the Quaid to be abandoned in favour of the garrison town of Rawalpindi-Islamabad. He had Pakistan renamed an Islamic Republic. He also explained the true concept of Iqbal’s “ khudi” to the field marshal and later helped formulate the 1962 constitution that fell into disuse when its author was pushed out of power by his army chief. Ayub was under the constant spiritual care of spirits and guides, wrote Mufti (whereas they should have attended to the spiritual needs of Yahya Khan).

Guided by the mysterious Ninety, Shahab had gone to Israel, Mufti wrote, as a UNESCO representative to look at Israeli school textbooks, but his actual purpose was to spend a night at the Al Aqsa mosque which he did by giving Israeli security the slip. He had to go to Al Aqsa, according to Mufti, to activate a metaphysical process which would reach fruition with the total destruction of the Zionist entity. One wonders why Yasir Arafat has not retired to the French Riviera since his mission has already been accomplished through the works of Shahab.

Mufti wasn’t alone in promoting what came to be known among the wags of Lahore as Silsala-e-Shahabia. Mufti wrote that Pakistan’s establishment was decided at a meeting of higher beings presided over by Sarkar Qibla, a divine buried near Islamabad. The killing of hundreds of thousands of Muslims was ordered by these otherworldly powers so that they could enter heaven as martyrs and become a spiritual army to guard the border at Wahga (while not forgetting Pakistan’s soft underbelly in the Rajasthan area, one hopes). Pakistan, Mufti disclosed, was being run in accordance with a Master Plan prepared by Sarkar Qibla. Mufti reproduced a letter from one Abdul Ghafoor, advocate, which said that the 1965 war was fought under the command of dervishes wielding “spiritual atomic power”.

Mufti wrote that certain spiritual presences ordered him to move to Rawalpindi and work under Shahab. Once there, he found himself the owner of a plot in Islamabad on which he built a house with money pouring in from mysterious sources. Another member of the Mufti family, the journalist and erstwhile filmmaker Ahmed Bashir had a vision that he had been sent to earth to make movies (all his movies crashed which only shows that angels know next to nothing about the film business). He made Neela parbat which ran for either three or four days (I saw it; it was a scream). Other believers in the Silsala also flourished and had their dreams come true. Mufti’s basic thesis was nothing is what it appears to be.

In every good thriller, there is a chase scene. In this one, it occurred in Paris when a black limo stopped to offer a lift to Shahab. He should have declined the offer because once he got in, he placed himself at the mercy of a Zionist magician who turned him into a “stinking chunk of flesh” and sent him packing to Pakistan where he arrived as “half a man”.

Well, both Shahab and Mufti are gone and may they rest in peace. My explanation for all this is simple Qudratullah Shahab had a puckish sense of humour. Mumtaz Mufti just got taken in.

(Friday Times)


Çÿ ÌÐÈ#1730; Ïá Ñ ã#1740;Ÿ ÇªæŸ ÀÑ #1740;Ò ãÞÇÈá  ÌÇ#1747;
ãäÒá ˜#1740; ØÑÝ Ïæ Ç㠍áæŸ ÇæÑ ÓÇãäÿ ãäÒá  ÌÇ#1747;

[Pracs]

Well, it is ''the other view'' and coming from the Friday Times falls truely on the extreme left. Ofocurse, I wouldn't agree on it.

But even if one agrees with the fictional nature the works of Shahab, why is it so special to have (and continues to)captured the hearts of hundreds of thousands of educated Pakistani youth across many generations now !

I guess this in itself proves quite a lot !

[Anusha]

Hi,

Mumtaz Mufti is one of the best writers in the whole world i have ever read. His writings are free from rehtoric and very easy to understand .They have a great effect on the minds of readers as the writer expresses his feelings like an ordinary man.
Once i read his book LABIAK, it changed my life .This book really has something in it.And as far as QuderatullaSahab is consulted ,it is confirmed that he was a saint. By reading his biography SHAHB NAMA, it has been revealed to me that in this world messengers of Allaha exists, And those who worship HIM from their hearts will easily approach HIM.
So,the works performed by both men are worth appreciating. And this is also honour for us that we have such a great writers, which belonged to our country. We must be proud of them.
.


Anusha Rafique