04-25-2005, 10:54 PM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Pracs</i>
<br />With all the history on Kashmir, I think the best option would be
1)Azad Kaskmir and Gilgit (Pakistan)
2)Kashmir Valley (joint india pakistan control under an internaional arrangement)
3)Jammu (India)
4)Ladakh (China).
The only new arrangement would be the one for ''2'', the other three regions are with the three different countries already. I think in this case the valley would revert to Pakistan as well. Ground reality is that an independant country (Kashmir) would not be in the geo political interest of the this region and for any of the three countries for that matter
"Allah does not change the state of people unless they change what is within themselves" Quran 1311
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Dear Pracs!
your post is very interesting, and it has raised a few points in my mind. I hope you will elaborate on that.
1. why ladakh should be given to china and on what basis? if i am not wrong, in ladakh mostly the population is bhudhist and they seems to be happy living under indian federation. certainly more happy than joining china.
2. how independent kashmir will not be in the geo-political interest of this region? was the creation of bangladesh or pakistan in geo-political interest of this region?
akhbarak eih habibbie!!!
<br />With all the history on Kashmir, I think the best option would be
1)Azad Kaskmir and Gilgit (Pakistan)
2)Kashmir Valley (joint india pakistan control under an internaional arrangement)
3)Jammu (India)
4)Ladakh (China).
The only new arrangement would be the one for ''2'', the other three regions are with the three different countries already. I think in this case the valley would revert to Pakistan as well. Ground reality is that an independant country (Kashmir) would not be in the geo political interest of the this region and for any of the three countries for that matter
"Allah does not change the state of people unless they change what is within themselves" Quran 1311
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Dear Pracs!
your post is very interesting, and it has raised a few points in my mind. I hope you will elaborate on that.
1. why ladakh should be given to china and on what basis? if i am not wrong, in ladakh mostly the population is bhudhist and they seems to be happy living under indian federation. certainly more happy than joining china.
2. how independent kashmir will not be in the geo-political interest of this region? was the creation of bangladesh or pakistan in geo-political interest of this region?
akhbarak eih habibbie!!!