11-24-2005, 12:21 AM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">
are you geting my point what I am trying to say...
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Ofcourse your view point is logical but for majority of us who are not sure what a particular profession entails, in other words to keep your options open, it is suggested that having a CA would 'only' increase your value and offer more flexibility than otherwise.
Simple MBA is waste of time, agreed, but even MBA from IBA or LUMS may be general qualification and there would be many people looking for jobs based on that piece of 'important' paper. Whereas, if one went to the CA route and by the time he/she would qualify not only they would have axquired good soft skills and CA qualification, but also the relevant work experience and exposure to variety of work would undoubtedly broaden the vision and offer easier transition than otherwise.
DT
are you geting my point what I am trying to say...
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Ofcourse your view point is logical but for majority of us who are not sure what a particular profession entails, in other words to keep your options open, it is suggested that having a CA would 'only' increase your value and offer more flexibility than otherwise.
Simple MBA is waste of time, agreed, but even MBA from IBA or LUMS may be general qualification and there would be many people looking for jobs based on that piece of 'important' paper. Whereas, if one went to the CA route and by the time he/she would qualify not only they would have axquired good soft skills and CA qualification, but also the relevant work experience and exposure to variety of work would undoubtedly broaden the vision and offer easier transition than otherwise.
DT
