03-31-2010, 05:29 PM
Osama
You will be the biggest destroyers if you will try to take law and authorities in your hands and if you will do extra judicial emotional things.
You will do nothing but Naoozbillah promote hatred of people against Islam; the people who can be converted to Islam and towards whom it is our duty to convey a good message of Allah.
This will harm the cause of Islam and we have seen results of such idiotic things. In Rushdi's case, we were affected and victims but due to our negative efforts and destructive approach the whole world is standing with Rushdi now. Although all kuffar is one nation, still we don't know how to present a valid case to safe gaurd the interest of muslims and Islam. Hamaaray Ulema "Jamshed Dasti" jaisay hotay hain. Jamshed was protesting against a women rights law; media asked "have you studied the draft". He replied, "No". Yeh tu haalat hai.
One more thing; if law is not doing some thing and you will take avenge at your own, law and society will never treat you as innocent; rather you yourself become an equal criminal. Just apply same rule in case of murder where law does not punish the murderer. What will you be called if you will take avenge at your own and murder the other. You will be called a "murderer" as well, although you had a valid case and irrespective that revenge was your right.
We have to understand that we are living in the word of 21st century. You cannot get back to zamana-e-Jahliyat when all these things were sorted out by "might is right" formula specially when you are not a "MIGHT" as well.
"You" means and includes every one including me.
Here the matter of Zaid Hamid has been raised and all powers and authorities are being given to so-called Ulema (jo khud zyada-tar Jamshed Dasti hotay hain) that they should call for clarifications and they should decide his faith (that's totally a matter between Abad and Allah), that they are empowered to other necessary things.
Yaar Khuda ke panaah; can any one tell where from this term "Ulema" emerged and where Quran and Hadees and Law have given them such powers and authorities? Are we carrying a destructive approach? Tabaah karna hai sab kuch? Yeh saarey Maulvi kahaan say certified hain keh inkaa eemaan he theek aur salaamat hai? Har Maulvi (of one sect) doosray maulvi (of other sect) ko ghalat aur kaafir samjhta hai aur doosray kay eeman aur faith ko ghalat maantaa hai? Kaisay yeh sab khud theek ho saktay hain? Have people not seen recent incidents of Faisalabad where these "ulema" were going to destroy the peace for their own issues? Yeh Aalim hotay hain, Allah muaaf rakhay aisay aalimon say. That's why I say keh big tummy, long beared and a piece of cloth on shoulders does not make out an aalim. The ones who find their livlihood by selling Allah's Ayaat-e-Kareema have been cursed. I am sorry to say but majority of these so-called Ulema is doing similar things and to promote their economic activity keep on raising such issues.
Yahan shreef aur sachay logon ka woh haal hota hai jo Sarfraz Naeemee saahib ka hua; I just remind you that "sach" (truth) and "purity" is very very rare. Agar yeh galiyon main chalti phirti mil jaaey tu Muslims kee woh haalat kabhi na ho jo ab hai.
Every one has to be answerable for his acts and deeds, yeh kaun hain? Have they to lie in others's graves? Agar kisi ko koi issue hai yah fitna ka darr hai tu he should adapt proper justified course as was done in case of Yousaf Kazzab. Khud decision karna chaahay woh theek bhi ho, kisi Aalim, Maulvi ya meray jaisay kaa kaam nahi.
Yeh aik baat aqal main nahi aa rahi aur ham paani main madhani chala rahay hain to prove Zaid Hamid a kaafir and follower of Yousaf Kazzab because he called some maulvis as "do takkay kay maulvi". Zaid Hamid, who has time and again explained his firm belief on Khatam-e-Nabbuwat. Yaar aik Muslim kay saath kitna zulam hai agar "parrots" usko civil society kay saamnay kaafir bana kar khara kar dein. Woh parrots jo khud aik doosray ke nazar main kaafir hain. Allah ke panaah.
I hope my point is clear now.
Regards,
You will be the biggest destroyers if you will try to take law and authorities in your hands and if you will do extra judicial emotional things.
You will do nothing but Naoozbillah promote hatred of people against Islam; the people who can be converted to Islam and towards whom it is our duty to convey a good message of Allah.
This will harm the cause of Islam and we have seen results of such idiotic things. In Rushdi's case, we were affected and victims but due to our negative efforts and destructive approach the whole world is standing with Rushdi now. Although all kuffar is one nation, still we don't know how to present a valid case to safe gaurd the interest of muslims and Islam. Hamaaray Ulema "Jamshed Dasti" jaisay hotay hain. Jamshed was protesting against a women rights law; media asked "have you studied the draft". He replied, "No". Yeh tu haalat hai.
One more thing; if law is not doing some thing and you will take avenge at your own, law and society will never treat you as innocent; rather you yourself become an equal criminal. Just apply same rule in case of murder where law does not punish the murderer. What will you be called if you will take avenge at your own and murder the other. You will be called a "murderer" as well, although you had a valid case and irrespective that revenge was your right.
We have to understand that we are living in the word of 21st century. You cannot get back to zamana-e-Jahliyat when all these things were sorted out by "might is right" formula specially when you are not a "MIGHT" as well.
"You" means and includes every one including me.
Here the matter of Zaid Hamid has been raised and all powers and authorities are being given to so-called Ulema (jo khud zyada-tar Jamshed Dasti hotay hain) that they should call for clarifications and they should decide his faith (that's totally a matter between Abad and Allah), that they are empowered to other necessary things.
Yaar Khuda ke panaah; can any one tell where from this term "Ulema" emerged and where Quran and Hadees and Law have given them such powers and authorities? Are we carrying a destructive approach? Tabaah karna hai sab kuch? Yeh saarey Maulvi kahaan say certified hain keh inkaa eemaan he theek aur salaamat hai? Har Maulvi (of one sect) doosray maulvi (of other sect) ko ghalat aur kaafir samjhta hai aur doosray kay eeman aur faith ko ghalat maantaa hai? Kaisay yeh sab khud theek ho saktay hain? Have people not seen recent incidents of Faisalabad where these "ulema" were going to destroy the peace for their own issues? Yeh Aalim hotay hain, Allah muaaf rakhay aisay aalimon say. That's why I say keh big tummy, long beared and a piece of cloth on shoulders does not make out an aalim. The ones who find their livlihood by selling Allah's Ayaat-e-Kareema have been cursed. I am sorry to say but majority of these so-called Ulema is doing similar things and to promote their economic activity keep on raising such issues.
Yahan shreef aur sachay logon ka woh haal hota hai jo Sarfraz Naeemee saahib ka hua; I just remind you that "sach" (truth) and "purity" is very very rare. Agar yeh galiyon main chalti phirti mil jaaey tu Muslims kee woh haalat kabhi na ho jo ab hai.
Every one has to be answerable for his acts and deeds, yeh kaun hain? Have they to lie in others's graves? Agar kisi ko koi issue hai yah fitna ka darr hai tu he should adapt proper justified course as was done in case of Yousaf Kazzab. Khud decision karna chaahay woh theek bhi ho, kisi Aalim, Maulvi ya meray jaisay kaa kaam nahi.
Yeh aik baat aqal main nahi aa rahi aur ham paani main madhani chala rahay hain to prove Zaid Hamid a kaafir and follower of Yousaf Kazzab because he called some maulvis as "do takkay kay maulvi". Zaid Hamid, who has time and again explained his firm belief on Khatam-e-Nabbuwat. Yaar aik Muslim kay saath kitna zulam hai agar "parrots" usko civil society kay saamnay kaafir bana kar khara kar dein. Woh parrots jo khud aik doosray ke nazar main kaafir hain. Allah ke panaah.
I hope my point is clear now.
Regards,
