03-25-2009, 04:24 PM
Dear Amir,
When I said I don't suspect, it was about 200 CIA officials, which we know are here in abundance and more specifically this is the issue on which you have not so far conflicted on your own words. I however did not agree about the specific number that has allegedly been deputed to control or spoil the media and only raised two points on that issue. How you were so confirmed about this specific number i.e. 200? I mean to say, why it could not be 199 or 201 or some other figure? Did you carry out some physical counting? My second point was, why such news (attack on media) always reach to you first of all and then don't get proved?
Your answers to my questions could not establish anything except for providing a hilarious info that the man who alleges the "Geo" as CIA agent believes in "Jang" so firmly ignoring that the owners of the both are same. I did agree with the presence of CIA officials be it 200 or whatever but I could not agree on second allegation specifically focusing "Geo", merely based upon something written in "Jang".
Now, the issue of Musharraf is altogether different. You had been saying what not and what not about him. I need not to go into details. Then all of a sudden he became so noble and truthful in your eyes. I personally don't find it a big issue as far as you are concerned. I know you keep on changing your opinion since you get influenced by whatever you read through whatever sources. Your opposition also carried similar attributes and now your favor does not portray anything different. So, I am not in any doubts or whim about the approach you have. However, this could be so suspicious for the others.
Here the fellow Nakaiun threw a big laughter that was too critical. Keeping in view his-self or others who may not know your approach I said changing of your views was suspicious and the laughter of Nakaiun was not unjustified.
As you normally do, you have mixed up two un-identical situations.
OMG how much effort has to be done every time to make you understand the things.
"Dil pay mat lena Bhaai yeh tu chalta he rehta hai"!!!
Regards,
KAMRAN.
When I said I don't suspect, it was about 200 CIA officials, which we know are here in abundance and more specifically this is the issue on which you have not so far conflicted on your own words. I however did not agree about the specific number that has allegedly been deputed to control or spoil the media and only raised two points on that issue. How you were so confirmed about this specific number i.e. 200? I mean to say, why it could not be 199 or 201 or some other figure? Did you carry out some physical counting? My second point was, why such news (attack on media) always reach to you first of all and then don't get proved?
Your answers to my questions could not establish anything except for providing a hilarious info that the man who alleges the "Geo" as CIA agent believes in "Jang" so firmly ignoring that the owners of the both are same. I did agree with the presence of CIA officials be it 200 or whatever but I could not agree on second allegation specifically focusing "Geo", merely based upon something written in "Jang".
Now, the issue of Musharraf is altogether different. You had been saying what not and what not about him. I need not to go into details. Then all of a sudden he became so noble and truthful in your eyes. I personally don't find it a big issue as far as you are concerned. I know you keep on changing your opinion since you get influenced by whatever you read through whatever sources. Your opposition also carried similar attributes and now your favor does not portray anything different. So, I am not in any doubts or whim about the approach you have. However, this could be so suspicious for the others.
Here the fellow Nakaiun threw a big laughter that was too critical. Keeping in view his-self or others who may not know your approach I said changing of your views was suspicious and the laughter of Nakaiun was not unjustified.
As you normally do, you have mixed up two un-identical situations.
OMG how much effort has to be done every time to make you understand the things.
"Dil pay mat lena Bhaai yeh tu chalta he rehta hai"!!!
Regards,
KAMRAN.