02-15-2010, 11:01 PM
Dear All,
I wish to reply the posts of some of the members on the topic that has been locked by Admin.
First of all it is directed to the writer of that thread.
Dear Justice Seeker,
The most strange fact of your case is, that you came with "stunning" effort of defaming some one personally using his name on a public forum and alleging the things that are not only detrimental to a person in isolation; rather will also put to stake the fame of three world class professional institutions of the world,......
......Yet
- You are not willing to disclose your personality even on the request of members of this forum to whom you are asking for help;
- You said you have Proofs, and when the nature and reliability of such Proofs is inquired in a very simple manner, you started to ask for time to reply such questions; Do you or some of the members of this forum feel that the people who have proofs (as you clearly mentioned) ask for time in this way? Do you feel, if you could not reply simple "checklist" sort of questions, (that were drafted to help you in identifying your strengths), you would ever be able to face Media and Courts and their spontaneous questions and counter questions. You are raising a big question and are so empty of the replies at all. What complexity you found in my questions? and;
- Unless you tell us who are you even it cannot be ensured that you are a CA student. Your mixed words and view point about profession make it clearer. At one side you are feeling yourself well wisher of profession (and also so worried for your CA) and on the other hand you wish the professionals to feel ashamed of. Merely for the questions raised by me or for my nature of an AUDITOR that has somewhat exposed your "PROOFS"? . What's your exact agenda? You know you cannot proceed with your case unless you have concrete evidence, and I know you are fully informed that you cannot even disclose your name in the absence of such proof; and this is exactly what you are doing here.
At this early stage, besides having lots of doubt on you as I have expressed, I don't feel it appropriate to reject your claim altogether. However, some where deep in mind, I know what this all is. Let's see if you can prove this statement as incorrect.
Although some names, if wrongly used, can affect repute of others (that's why various defamatory laws are in place), yet I would again say that act of individual can be washed out if the required suitable action is taken. Issue is, what recourse is available if you did this all for defaming some one?
I hope you will think on this sincerely (if you are sincere and serious) and come up with required explanation provided you wish to follow ethics and have a nice character. Still, we hope to listen/see something from you (although I feel you will never come back).
Yes, provided your case is genuine and come out as a genuine claimant, we will be joining hands for your betterment and for saving the goodwill.
I suggest you not to mention any name unless you can prove it. And you must feel you can prove something, if you don't need time relaxations to bring out the facts or answer the simple questions.
DEAR ADMIN,
I request you to, instead of locking such Thread, please delete this thread as a whole or at least edit the name of the person, this fellow mentioned invariably without any logical basis.
This will make the forum uncontroversial in all sort of ultimate resolutions of this matter.
Dear GreatKhans,
Yes, I promise you that we will help this Justice Seeker by all means if he really has a genuine case and brings up some real facts. We can have a meeting with President, ex-presidents, council members, Vice President (North), Executive Director, Directors of various Directorates, committees and their members and so much else that would be possible. Media is at arm's distance as well, be it Kamran Khan or any one else.
However, you can very well deduce the doubted-ness of the case from ....................; Let's see.
Shani420,
You must carefully read some one's post, as well as the post to which it is directed to, before commenting on it. His post was partially directed to get the answer what he got. If he will avoid, I have no concern whatsoever with any one's chonch be it created by ALLAH or temporarily developed by some one's confused mind.
Notwithstanding anything that is being discussed here or that we may come to know in future (I hope nothing bad will be uncovered and I hope this all is something to defame him), the person named by Justice Seeker is a figure, a highly qualified professional, an ideal for a large student community, a very energetic, committed and determined hard worker, a man whose stature cannot be affected by any thing cheap and baseless, a person who brought respect to the name of his country and profession (so far), a man who is extremely well mannered and polite and knows how to honour the others and a man that I witness is in fact a balanced personality.
So he can be a friend of a so manys and I must not be an exception being a member of this apex and honoured professional body. Do you have any issue with it? If you have, let me know please.
All others,
I would again say that please hold on and let's see what comes out of it.
Regards,
KAMRAN.
I wish to reply the posts of some of the members on the topic that has been locked by Admin.
First of all it is directed to the writer of that thread.
Dear Justice Seeker,
The most strange fact of your case is, that you came with "stunning" effort of defaming some one personally using his name on a public forum and alleging the things that are not only detrimental to a person in isolation; rather will also put to stake the fame of three world class professional institutions of the world,......
......Yet
- You are not willing to disclose your personality even on the request of members of this forum to whom you are asking for help;
- You said you have Proofs, and when the nature and reliability of such Proofs is inquired in a very simple manner, you started to ask for time to reply such questions; Do you or some of the members of this forum feel that the people who have proofs (as you clearly mentioned) ask for time in this way? Do you feel, if you could not reply simple "checklist" sort of questions, (that were drafted to help you in identifying your strengths), you would ever be able to face Media and Courts and their spontaneous questions and counter questions. You are raising a big question and are so empty of the replies at all. What complexity you found in my questions? and;
- Unless you tell us who are you even it cannot be ensured that you are a CA student. Your mixed words and view point about profession make it clearer. At one side you are feeling yourself well wisher of profession (and also so worried for your CA) and on the other hand you wish the professionals to feel ashamed of. Merely for the questions raised by me or for my nature of an AUDITOR that has somewhat exposed your "PROOFS"? . What's your exact agenda? You know you cannot proceed with your case unless you have concrete evidence, and I know you are fully informed that you cannot even disclose your name in the absence of such proof; and this is exactly what you are doing here.
At this early stage, besides having lots of doubt on you as I have expressed, I don't feel it appropriate to reject your claim altogether. However, some where deep in mind, I know what this all is. Let's see if you can prove this statement as incorrect.
Although some names, if wrongly used, can affect repute of others (that's why various defamatory laws are in place), yet I would again say that act of individual can be washed out if the required suitable action is taken. Issue is, what recourse is available if you did this all for defaming some one?
I hope you will think on this sincerely (if you are sincere and serious) and come up with required explanation provided you wish to follow ethics and have a nice character. Still, we hope to listen/see something from you (although I feel you will never come back).
Yes, provided your case is genuine and come out as a genuine claimant, we will be joining hands for your betterment and for saving the goodwill.
I suggest you not to mention any name unless you can prove it. And you must feel you can prove something, if you don't need time relaxations to bring out the facts or answer the simple questions.
DEAR ADMIN,
I request you to, instead of locking such Thread, please delete this thread as a whole or at least edit the name of the person, this fellow mentioned invariably without any logical basis.
This will make the forum uncontroversial in all sort of ultimate resolutions of this matter.
Dear GreatKhans,
Yes, I promise you that we will help this Justice Seeker by all means if he really has a genuine case and brings up some real facts. We can have a meeting with President, ex-presidents, council members, Vice President (North), Executive Director, Directors of various Directorates, committees and their members and so much else that would be possible. Media is at arm's distance as well, be it Kamran Khan or any one else.
However, you can very well deduce the doubted-ness of the case from ....................; Let's see.
Shani420,
You must carefully read some one's post, as well as the post to which it is directed to, before commenting on it. His post was partially directed to get the answer what he got. If he will avoid, I have no concern whatsoever with any one's chonch be it created by ALLAH or temporarily developed by some one's confused mind.
Notwithstanding anything that is being discussed here or that we may come to know in future (I hope nothing bad will be uncovered and I hope this all is something to defame him), the person named by Justice Seeker is a figure, a highly qualified professional, an ideal for a large student community, a very energetic, committed and determined hard worker, a man whose stature cannot be affected by any thing cheap and baseless, a person who brought respect to the name of his country and profession (so far), a man who is extremely well mannered and polite and knows how to honour the others and a man that I witness is in fact a balanced personality.
So he can be a friend of a so manys and I must not be an exception being a member of this apex and honoured professional body. Do you have any issue with it? If you have, let me know please.
All others,
I would again say that please hold on and let's see what comes out of it.
Regards,
KAMRAN.